Stand· civic
← Back to Learn Water · Civics

What a Groundwater Conservation District actually controls

In most of rural and suburban Texas, the body with the most direct power over how much water a data center can pump is not the county commission. It is the Groundwater Conservation District — an elected or appointed board most residents have never heard of. Understanding how a GCD works is the single most useful civic fact for anyone following a large-water-use project.

Why GCDs exist

For most of Texas history, groundwater was governed by the rule of capture. In plain terms: if you own the land above an aquifer, you may drill a well and pump whatever the pump can produce, even if that lowers your neighbor's well. The doctrine dates to an 1857 court case and was reaffirmed by the Texas Supreme Court as recently as 1999.[1]

Groundwater Conservation Districts are the statutory exception. In 1949, the Legislature allowed local voters to create water-management districts. In 1997, it passed Senate Bill 1 — the modern framework — and a steady sequence of laws has built up the authority that now lives in Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code.[2] A GCD is a political subdivision of the state, created to protect a shared aquifer inside its boundary.

Today there are roughly 100 confirmed GCDs covering a majority of Texas counties. Some cover a single county. Some cover many. Some counties have none. Whether your county has a GCD — and which one — is the first fact that determines who decides how much a data center can pump.

What a GCD can actually do

Under Chapter 36, a GCD has a specific set of tools. Not every district uses every tool aggressively, but the legal authority is consistent statewide.

A county commission can zone. A GCD can refuse to permit the pumping. The two are separate decisions.

How a typical permit application works

When a data-center operator wants to drill a large water well, the process usually runs like this:

  1. The operator files a permit application with the GCD that covers the project parcel.
  2. The district notices the application publicly — typically in a local newspaper of record and on the district website — and sets a hearing date.
  3. Neighbors, cities, and other interested parties may file protests. Under Chapter 36, a timely protest by an affected person can trigger a contested case hearing, which is a formal evidentiary proceeding.[5]
  4. The district's board considers staff analysis, aquifer data, and any protest evidence. It may approve, deny, or condition the permit (common conditions include production caps, metering requirements, or drought triggers).
  5. A party not satisfied with the outcome may appeal to state district court under Chapter 36.

The public has standing to participate at each stage. Showing up at the hearing, submitting written comment, and — where allowed — formally protesting are all documented in the district record.

The two parallel decisions

Data-center proposal operator files permits County commission Zoning / rezoning Tax abatement (Ch. 312) Land-use and road access Groundwater Conservation District Well production permit Peak-day withdrawal cap Metering + reporting rules Facility can operate
Both approvals are typically required. Counties with no GCD skip the right-hand step.

GCDs covering the 20 priority Texas counties

The table below lists, to the best of Stand's verification as of April 2026, the Groundwater Conservation District that has primary jurisdiction over each of the 20 priority counties Stand is tracking. Where no district has jurisdiction, water use is regulated instead by the city utility or — in the Houston area — the Harris-Galveston Subsidence District.

CountyGCD or authority
HarrisHarris-Galveston Subsidence District (not a GCD, but similar authority)
DallasNo GCD; city utilities + TCEQ
TarrantNo GCD; Fort Worth utility
CollinNo GCD; North Texas Municipal Water District
DentonNo GCD; Upper Trinity Regional Water District (wholesale)
TravisBarton Springs–Edwards Aquifer CD (partial); municipal
WilliamsonCentral Texas GCD; Clearwater UWCD (portions)
BexarEdwards Aquifer Authority; Trinity Glen Rose GCD (portions)
HaysHays Trinity GCD; Barton Springs–Edwards Aquifer CD
ComalEdwards Aquifer Authority (EAA); Trinity Edwards Springs Protection Assoc.
KendallCow Creek GCD
BastropLost Pines GCD
CaldwellPlum Creek CD
EllisNo GCD; city utilities; Trinity Groundwater Partnership in the area
JohnsonPrairielands GCD
ParkerUpper Trinity GCD
WiseUpper Trinity GCD
KaufmanNo GCD (most of county); municipal
RockwallNo GCD; North Texas Municipal Water District
HuntNo GCD (most of county); municipal
Verify before relying. GCD boundaries change as districts are created or merged, and a single county may fall inside more than one district. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts publishes a current list; the Texas Water Development Board maintains the authoritative GIS layer. A five-minute check against those sources will confirm jurisdiction for any specific parcel.

Why residents often miss the GCD vote

County commission meetings attract more attention than GCD board meetings for understandable reasons. Commissions meet in a single well-known courthouse, cover every public issue, and are covered by local press. A GCD board might meet once a month in a small office, publish its agenda on a district website that few people have bookmarked, and set policies that are technical rather than visibly political.

And yet, for a project that depends on large-volume pumping, the GCD vote is often the one that ultimately determines whether the facility is feasible. A county commission can zone a site for industrial use all day long; if the GCD denies the pumping permit or imposes a low cap, the project changes or fails.

How to find your GCD's next meeting

Three reliable sources:

  1. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts (tagd.org) maintains a directory of districts with links to each district's website.
  2. The Texas Water Development Board publishes a GIS layer showing GCD boundaries statewide.
  3. Each district is required by the Texas Open Meetings Act to post its agenda at least 72 hours before the meeting.[6]

Board meetings are open to the public. Public comment is typically allowed. For a data-center proposal that depends on large pumping, this is the room to be in.

Sources

  1. Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc., 1 S.W.3d 75 (Tex. 1999), reaffirming the rule of capture.
  2. Texas Water Code, Chapter 36 — Groundwater Conservation Districts.
  3. Texas Water Code § 36.117, exempt wells and permit thresholds.
  4. Texas Water Code § 36.108, joint planning and desired future conditions.
  5. Texas Water Code §§ 36.402–36.416, contested-case hearing procedures.
  6. Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts, Directory of Groundwater Conservation Districts, 2024–2025 edition.
  7. Texas Open Meetings Act, Government Code Chapter 551.